Letter: Council priorities - toilets v safety

.

Suzanne Williams

I, too, am concerned about the new toilets in Lovelock Street – they are pretty, of course, but necessary?

When Pak’n Save has a quite adequate one in the shop 100 metres away?

However, there is a more serious problem with the council’s priorities; one which I have written about before:  crossings.  

First, I want to make it clear that I have received (almost) nothing but the utmost courtesy from Whakatāne drivers.  

They are so polite that although I am forever waving them on, they nearly always decline.

Since I have been in this town, there have been some nice new red crossings done, but to me, as a frequent mobility scooter user, there often seems no sense in the choice of site.  

I would like to know from Mayor Nandor Tanczos, what criteria are used when decisions are made as to where to place these.  

As a layman, one hopes that these would relate to amount of traffic using the road, plus, to a lesser degree, types of people perceived to be using them; therefore the Goulstone Road ones are reasonable to me.  

But, why two on Salonika Street, with little traffic?

Does a councillor live there? Why only one old one outside the school on Alexander Avenue, a much busier road?  

And why, on two of the longest and most dangerous roads in Whakatāne, Landing/Domain and Commerce, are there so pathetically few: two, and one?

And how do you cross State Highway 30 at The Hub?

In a town so concerned with health and safety, it seems to me that a little more concern would not be wasted on the old and disabled.

I think it would be a great idea if, as part of “Outreach”, each councillor and the chief executive undertake to use a scooter or a wheelchair for a day or two.  

It’s so exciting navigating around all the cars, vans and trailers parked on the footpaths, and bumping over the uneven paths.

Have fun.

Support the journalism you love

Make a Donation